A TV presenter and his producer, are nowhere in the late evening TV until a woman suicide on their program. Suddenly, they have the next big reality show concept (although the air line instead of television, to avoid legal problems) - Every week someone with a deadly disease researched their lives on the broadcast series to end their seven days with the suicide.
The three-length issue is correct. The first uses the term, its grounds and the characters. Issue # 2 works on the principle, the evidence of its impact, and creates a Cliffhanger in a famous person. Issue # 3 addresses the above, and its explanation about the disease from the research of the celebrity and was not with the means which they nourished. (Though of course, on this point, on his exaggeration.)
It is a concept of dynamite in many ways, and Scalera an excellent job introduction of the principle - what is plausible that the characters we can sympathize with the would such a thing - and different parts of it - as they respond to fame? judicial disputes? the legal quandries?
Unfortunately, the art is terrible. Nick Diaz called Number 1, and it is not yet ready for a professional work. A lot of the story revolves around passionate discussions, which have a capacity of two people (especially faces) to speak and entertaining scenes. It creates laughably Wasserspeiers-esque terms and guide difforme, so that "I am in search?" Risk of distraction from the multi-layers. Dennis Budd again the 2 and 3 It is better that Diaz, but the work is still subject to distortions.
The concepts are well on the idea, but I wish that almost Scalera had written in prose, instead of this because I would focus on the ideas without distraction. I'm not sure why it was a strange, Scalera know about the site.
The three-length issue is correct. The first uses the term, its grounds and the characters. Issue # 2 works on the principle, the evidence of its impact, and creates a Cliffhanger in a famous person. Issue # 3 addresses the above, and its explanation about the disease from the research of the celebrity and was not with the means which they nourished. (Though of course, on this point, on his exaggeration.)
It is a concept of dynamite in many ways, and Scalera an excellent job introduction of the principle - what is plausible that the characters we can sympathize with the would such a thing - and different parts of it - as they respond to fame? judicial disputes? the legal quandries?
Unfortunately, the art is terrible. Nick Diaz called Number 1, and it is not yet ready for a professional work. A lot of the story revolves around passionate discussions, which have a capacity of two people (especially faces) to speak and entertaining scenes. It creates laughably Wasserspeiers-esque terms and guide difforme, so that "I am in search?" Risk of distraction from the multi-layers. Dennis Budd again the 2 and 3 It is better that Diaz, but the work is still subject to distortions.
The concepts are well on the idea, but I wish that almost Scalera had written in prose, instead of this because I would focus on the ideas without distraction. I'm not sure why it was a strange, Scalera know about the site.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar